

(One of) life's basic physical feedback-dynamics: a self-perpetuating loop within an energy gradient
A persistent energy gradient (such as: any gradual/flowing variation, such as light vs. dark, hot vs. cold, potential energy like chemical potential vs. a state of equilibrium/balance) contains flows of energy.
If some part of those flows can loop - feeding part of their output back into their own continuation - then the system gains a form of self-sustenance/maintenance.
If the transformation from the outcome [of a flow of energy] creates the conditions that caused it, the loop sustains itself. Where the outcome produces the initiating condition would be a basic feedback-dynamic of life.
Observable rule: whenever a feedback-loop manages to channel external energy through itself faster than it dissipates, it becomes a persistent structure - this principle operates from whirlpools to cells.
Thermodynamic self-sustenance in dissipative structures (through entropy)
An open system far from equilibrium could fall into order: doing so dissipates the energy gradient more efficiently.
Life (also) works through that rule - also embodying the gradient.
So a major physical driver of life is the tendency of matter to arrange itself into feedback-structures that accelerate overall entropy/balancing out/dissipation, while maintaining local order/alignment.
Life is a stable conduit for energy flow that uses feedback to preserve the conduit itself.
Homeostasis and control: reactive feedback through balancing
Once internal conditions matter for survival, the system should keep balancing itself.
Deviations/imbalances (naturally) cause consequences which cause a correction, forming reactive feedback-loops. This happens both within one's body and in the surroundings.
Cybernetically, each loop implements:
Error = Desired state - Perceived state.
Action is proportional to the absence of any error (action ∝ -error).
That rule (which could, for example, be realized chemically, neurologically, or socially) is the 'mechanical' core of stability in every living system.
Anticipation: predictive and proactive feedback
Homeostasis alone would be reactive. A system that can model trends - predicting rather than reacting - can stay aligned with its environment better.
Chemically, primitive feed-forward control could be when one metabolite triggers enzymes before its concentration changes.
In nervous systems this becomes explicit prediction: the brain minimizes the surprise (prediction-error) between expected and actual sensory input.
Perception allows one to infer about the causes of sensations.
Action alter the world to make predictions come true more.
So cognition is a hierarchy of feedback-loops predicting the results of their own feedback.
Hierarchical feedback-structures: interaction across scales
Each living system contains many nested feedback-loops. There are more short-term and more long-term feedback-loops - the interaction of which is what gives organisms coherence across timescales.
Self-reference and feedback through inner reflection and outer representation
In intelligent living beings, an important feedback-loop is where circumstances can become represented within such a loop - being: one's cognition (cognition is self-referential inquiry and possibly direction based upon that); carrying models of manifestations: when one network monitors the activity of another and feeds that information back ('meta-representation').
Language, then, would be a means to codify in the outer concepts that one has developed in the inner(: cognition) - where writing is a means of even making it more permanent because one could express oneself through (codification set in) outer forms: like an inscription in a rock, or writing on a piece of paper - language making interaction across organisms possible, and writing making interaction across longer timescales possible.
Culture, then, would be collective self-reflection/('modelling').
Both cognition and culture emerge from, and so are a direct thermodynamic continuations/extensions of, earlier loops - making neither separate from the other.
How order(: negentropy) and randomness(: entropy) yield order mechanistically
Positive catalytic feedback amplifies certain patterns, increasing local specificity in alignment/order(: reducing internal entropy).
Negative feedback stabilizes those patterns against perturbations.
Predictive loops fold temporal correlations into internal structure, increasing mutual information with the environment.
Energy throughput powers the maintenance of those low-entropy/negentropic, or in other words: ordered, patterns.
Thus negentropy arises when energetic flux is harnessed by feedback architectures that preferentially amplify proportioned - and potentially environmentally correlated - structures: those could be aligned patterns.
The feedback-loop that is one's being aware of something
Acts of perception/sensation are (essentially) a loop of the sensing of the environment through having the outer information be represented/reflected in an inwards representation, allowing one to act in order to try to influence the surroundings.
All living and cognitive processes are ways of organizing the flow of energy so as to persist.
Hence: life would be localized coherence in a global thermodynamic flux.
Information is essentially the form/shape energy takes as it flows(: the form/shape the way the energy flows, creates) through surrounding constraints.
When this form becomes recursive: when patterns encode patterns of themselves, the system - as it were, or literally: in case of one's actual awareness/consciousness - gains awareness: a capacity to self-reflect(/as it were 'modelling' perceived, such as one's own or circumstantial, states).
When this self-reflection/recursion happens at a high rate(: making it one has a lot of processing power through this self-reflection occurring at high speed), awareness becomes 'reflexive': one senses/is aware that one senses/is aware.
Awareness is one interacting with an influx of energy from one's circumstances, and thus (at least: a part of) the universe's receiving feedback about itself.
Feedback is the universal mechanism connecting the scales of the universe.
At the physical level, it's thermodynamic homeostasis; at the conscious/supernatural level, it's resonance and informational self-reference.
Both describe alignment of flow - whether of energy, information, or awareness - toward sustaining coherent existence.
Negentropy/low-entropy is the local preservation of order through energy flow.
Alignment or resonant coherence across aspects to reality essentially follow the same function or principle: maintaining stability and persistence of being.
Awareness/cognition would be what happens when thermodynamic negentropy becomes reflexive: when a feedback-loop begins to influence and be influenced by itself.


Reality as standing waveform
Things/energy are frequential in nature.
These waveforms(: oscillations of fields) are loops.
Loops consist of iterative(: again and again many times) recursion(: being 'thrown' back onto/confronted or interacting with itself), where feedback where the outcome is the beginning of the next cycle - and so there is feedback.
When sound waves encounter a boundary, part of their energy is reflected.
If that reflected wave overlaps the incoming one at just the right timing and distance, resonance occurs: standing waveforms. When two waves meet, their amplitudes add - creating:
~ Constructive interference → stronger combined signal.
~ Destructive interference → cancellation.
Thus, through this feedback, frequencies may 'clip', meaning frequencies interact with themselves as - as part of a loop - the energy is being confronted with the energy present, either:
~ Resonating(: amplifying one another).
~ Dissonating(: destructive interference/cancelling out).
Thus creating/forming harmonics: standing waves forming stable patterns that could carry/represent(: and in that sense 'reflect') information/meaning.
So, this 'clipping' of frequencies (coming from the feedback of them interacting with themselves recursively) can happen constructively - creating coherence through resonance.
Reflection is feedback: (part of) a wave reflects back to where it came from.
That returning energy lets the system compare its own output with its input.
When the timing (phase) lines up, you get stable/coherent patterns that carry information about both the source and its environment.
So reflection produces self-referential structure - a prerequisite for any form of self-awareness.
Resonance means a system stores and reinforces energy at particular frequencies due to constructive feedback between outgoing and reflected waves.
Coherence as structure
When this resonance of these waveforms begin to become coherent/stable, persistent structures/forms come about as energy reflects, aligns, and stabilizes as a coherent oscillatory loop.
Resonance means:
~ In sound: tones reinforce one another, making them grow stronger.
~ In cognition: feedback-loops (like thought or memory) reinforce patterns.
~ In ecosystems or societies: feedback stabilizes rhythms (or destabilizes them, if out of phase).
Thus, if one recognizes that in a frequency (of, say, sound or vibration - or of a flow of energy) is a feed of information, then one could recognize that reality is in fact resonating with itself as systems evolve coherence through recursive feedback.
Awareness and reality are energy in feedback, which generates coherence through (constructive) resonance:
~ Reality contains countless self-resonant processes: from atoms to planets to the brain.
~ Coherence, stability, and form often emerge from resonance conditions.
~ Consciousness, in neuroscience, shows self-sustaining oscillations that can indeed be described as resonance among neural circuits.
So: reflection → resonance → coherence is a real, measurable chain.
The same principle governs physical waves, biological rhythms, and even cognitive feedback.
Things naturally balance out over time: entropy - though locally this balancing may yield/preserve order.
Resonant cavities and nested(: scale-recursive) natural systems evolve and 'balance'(: stabalize into coherence) through the same iterative self-reflection - thus, becoming increasingly 'well-balanced'.

Feedback-loops
Constructive informational coherency such as coherent resonances can also allow a feedback-loop becoming self-correcting and self-tuning, such as is the case in one's realizing one's own existence.
A self-resonant system doesn't just passively exist; it sustains itself using feedback about itself.
Cognition also is (iterative) recursive feedback: like one senses the outer world being reflected(/'projected') in one's mind/inner/psyche - or like one could anticipate/think predictively, for example.
If the universe is a network of interacting frequencies, then evolution - physical, emotional, spiritual - is the process of refining the bandwidths of consciousness.
In biological or psychological terms, the phrasing 'resonance' could also include: synchronized neural oscillations, heart-rate coherence, or entrainment/syncing of the rythms of one's cycles between people can sometimes be measured, though these are ordinary biophysical synchronizations.
Physical systems, including brains, are conducting energy/information-systems also chiefly directed by feedback. Coherent iterative feedback-loops facilitate complex awareness/intelligence.
Reality seems to be (a) continuous field(s) of energy-information (like light, matter or electromagnetism) organized locally into resonant loops (like, for example, in: atoms, cells, one's brain).
Since reality is fundamentally (constructively) resonant, feedback is not a mere artifact - it's something essential and fundamental.

Inner harmonics/emotions would be cymatic (energetic) wave-like expressions, being resonances or waveforms. Beyond one's occupation of one's solid/physical embodiment, [the energy of] one's energetic embodiments could perhaps go/travel to different bandwidths.

Examples of this proportion/ratio occurring in nature:
~ Phyllotaxis (plant growth): leaf and seed arrangements follow φ(≈1.618) to optimize packing and energy flow - effectively distributing vibration or light evenly.
~ Spiral shells and galaxies: natural logarithmic spirals - based on (≈1.618) - allow uniform angular growth, avoiding destructive interference: a geometric resonance stability.
φ(≈1.618) used in art/(typically classic) architecture:
~ When builders used φ(≈1.618), they were - as it would seem - not necessarily calculating wave physics but intuitively seeking visual and spatial coherence that feels balanced to perception.
Proportionality allowing for nesting of scales and coherence/communication throughout those scales
Resonances across many (for example: acoustic, electromagnetic, or even the smallest of/'quantum'-)scales have certain proportions in the peaks of their waveform. One could model/represent these resonances as nodal patterns, where these nodes form geometric ratios.
Systems that distribute energy efficiently across modes often approximate φ(≈1.618) relationships - for example: the ratio between successive vibration modes in many self-organizing systems (soap bubbles, vibrating membranes) tends toward proportions such as φ(≈1.618) or √2(≈1.414), which prevent resonant collapse/destructive (self-)interference; so these harmonic proportions ensure non-destructive(: not self-interfering)resonance-waves don't just perfectly overlap and so cancel out - leading to dynamic stability of the resonance-waves.
φ(≈1.618), therefore, is not only aesthetically pleasing - it actually makes for harmonic order/coherence (hence: well-balancedness).
So, proportion and resonance are linked mathematically: classical architecture and natural forms embody the same conditions that allow waves to stand and reflect coherently( - essentially making them embodiments of resonance as expressed through their geometries/the proportions of their forms).
Many systems are nested or scale-recursive:
~ Molecules within cells within tissues within organisms within ecosystems.
~ Vibrations within vibrations (harmonics inside harmonics).
~ Climate models, economic networks and galactic structures - for example - all show feedback across scales.
Each level operates at its own frequency-band, yet interacts through coupling-energy or information-flows from smaller to bigger and bigger to smaller.
This shows the 'fractal'-principle of 'worlds within worlds': coherent subsystems communicating through resonance or feedback-loops across scales.

Matter and energy behave like overlapping/interfering waves, for example:
~ At the microscopic sub-atomic scale, all substances are said to be able to shift between particle-like behavior and more 'spread-out' wave-like behavior: this principle/phenomenon is referred to as the wave/particle-duality.
~ Optics and acoustics: complex standing wave-fields form patterns that make up stable/coherent structures (like with having nodes, antinodes).
~ Condensed-matter physics: crystalline and quasiperiodic materials are literally standing interference-patterns of atomic waves.
Scales - such as from subatomic to cosmic - have their own band of resonant frequencies and characteristic wavelengths. Take, for example:
~ Electrons around nuclei.
~ Molecular vibrations.
~ Planetary orbits.
~ Galactic rotations.
Because these spectra/'layers' overlap - but don't collapse into - one another, each (fractal or at least fractal-like) scale/dimension(ality) forms a self-consistent/coherent world(: with its own founding properties/'rules' or 'laws').
In that sense, different levels/realms of the same standing wave-field/frequency-spectrum/tonal continuum - each perceivable only within its own wavelength/frequency or scale(-window); and are nested within - encompassing - one another.
These 'realms' are part/aspects/facets of a continuous whole; for example:
~ Quantum-to-chemical transitions occur via shared/consistently coherently behaving energy-quanta.
~ Gravitational and electromagnetic forces link macroscopic and microscopic paradigms.
~ Biological systems literally bridge molecular vibrations and macroscopic perception.
This means interference at one level can modulate patterns at another: fractal(-like) inter-'realm' resonance.
The universe (often) has nested toroidal and fractal geometries that have scales/'layers' interact, linking them.
Maintaining coherence across scales requires exactly the recursive/nested φ(≈1.618)-proportion where the part mirrors the whole, yet remains distinct/unique (though perhaps: similar) - essentially through being perfectly timed feedback/(self-)interference(: in perfect phase-delay, or: with perfect proportioned timing/increments in time).

An example of a type of fractal: the Julia-set.

Another example of the same type of fractal: the Julia-set - created/generated from a different initial starting/base-value.


Regarding the 'God'-matter:
There would be an psychic/auric(: psycho-auric) energetic field(: of the dimension of one's conscious awareness/inner experiencing), which also interacts with the physical outer reality that we currently are familiar with. Inner and outer would be expressions of the same dynamic field of frequencies viewed from two directions: from the inner to outer, and from the outer into the outer... (Each perpective would be a unique angle of reflection within the total 'mirror'.) As the outer can be seen from the inner, yet the inner cannot be sensed from the outer except for through its outer expressions with the exception of feeling, this would show that the physical is a different frequency of the energy of feeling originating from or correlated to the dimension of one's inner.

The field that spans both of these could have compassion or facilitate the right spiritual contact, operating like a mainframe behind our reality. But there is no way for one to know for certain that there would be a single highest thing in an infinite existence: how could one know for certain that this 'alleged' God would in fact be the universe at large, and not just the greater universe? Meanwhile, it would - in an infinite existence(: there is always something else) - be impossible for there to be a single highest: as infinity does not allow for there to be a 'top', or for it to not be a differentiation within its own spectrum or for there to be multiple fundamental entities from which we would fundamentally stem. And even the Bible says that there are multiple Gods, as in Genesis(: the opening part) it says: "Then the LORD God said: 'now man [humankind] has become like Us.'" - where 'like Us' would mean there are multiple Gods, also given that the 'U' in 'Us' is capitalized. For source: Infinity Essentials Art Source. What seems to be a common denominator amongst all life that we are individuals - which is a quality which we all share in some way and therefore could be unified in. Therefore, that which operates the mainframe could be consisting of many consciousnesses each working their own 'cog' or 'tone'/'tune' being the spectrum of energy that makes up their embodiment (be it physical/outer or energetic/inner). This mainframe could be the collective coherence of innumerable self-aware fields of certain (frequency-)bandwidths of force/energy: like every expression(: this expression being like a plug into a collective frequency-bandwidth) having its own inner, each corresponding to its own frequency/'tone' being its own personal inner harmonics (like feelings and the 'tones' or 'colors' of this individual's character). Each 'tone'/expression could contribute its particular perspective - the totality being a living symphony. (Compassion would be the mutually resonating inner states. Things would be different frequencies of a substrate, the way light could manifest as color or heat depending on vibration.)

I would say that as a 'zero-point' to our existence/reality, this would rather be - like the phi-ratio φ(≈1.618) would provide scale-invariant resonance across scales in a system where this proportionality provides nested unique 'realities within realities' - an 'equals-point': of such scale-invariant resonance/coherence/integration(: behaving as though one); which may begin to fluctuate (upon polarization) into resonating different frequencies(: with deviating phases - at different paces) - (with) which this foundational frequency begins to resonate/interact. This base-frequency would be a foundational substrate (fundamentally making up what is derived from it as well)(: one of 'Godheads', 'cosmic root-individuals'/intelligences - including such as in the sense of imagination and character-/inner harmonics/tones/frequencies, so informational coherence - being a reality from which other realities, such as our outer reality, could and would have been derived/manisted - as in through potential becoming manifested) to our dimension(s) (regardless of whether this substrate could be a/have differentiation within its own field/dimension/polarization/spectra or, in other words: be one among many more, as part of a greater continuum). So, the (at least relative/local encompassing/foundational) 'Godhead' would not so much be a 'zero-point', but an 'equals'-point of scale-invariant (in the sense of something recurring throughout many scales, also analogous to how something homogenous and isotropic/symmetry could/would consistently/continuously recur in many areas) resonance. As said, from this 'equals-point', subtle variations could phase-shift(: move at a different pace) - tiny differentiations/fluctuations in resonance that express it(s essence) in motion/movement: thus revealing it in a less concentrated/more 'refracted' way (through self-interference).

One (or at least I) could perceive/sense the outer with(in) my inner (psyche/mind), but could not observe someone else's inner (psyche) directly - therefore we often say: "I cannot read your thoughts/mind". Even though (or even: even if), during states of intensified psychic activation - at specific moments - one's inner state may begin to resonate with someone else's, and one could infer from one's own feeling what another's (state of) mind would be - one could still only infer someone else's inner from its (perceivable) manifestations (whether those would be physical or not).
So the more subtle would approach founding 'Godhead'-resonance more subtly, as opposed to the (polarized) expression(s)...

These - therefore - more well-balanced energies/feelings/'sounds'/manifestations would be more in tune or (finely) aligned with the greater(/greatest?/)cosmic coherence...
Our physical existence would occur within an imaginative substrate - the end only being the beginning.
This substrate will rejuvenate, as we are its exertion - which dissolve back into it.


Fundament(s) of the reality
Towards this (scale-invariant) 'godhead'-resonance would be a founding and so 'encompassing', more non-local (so also: superseding linear causality) substrate/underlying or deeper/more fundamental layer - of which our reality would be (being) manifested potential (and could be seen as being like a wave in/of a sea, being/portraing the timeless substrate/'godhead'-resonance) through self-organizing cycles, where facets interact by physical feedback(: resonance) - as they would in a reality with an underlying structure and/or geometry; which would be consistent with the cyclic nature observed throughout (the scales of) the universe(: nature does typically not produce discontinuities). The cycles arise from the recursive nature of the universe: the fact that things are confronted with themselves, meaning feedback-dynamics would be fundamental - and also making for pattern-formation as cycles progress.
Patterns repeat throughout scales; this self-similarity implies that the universe's structure and coherence arises from recursive informational rules (like when applied iteratively, such as in the case of a fractal) - which would also indicate that reality also has a holographic(: integral, holistic) structure: where parts contain information about the whole. Cells containing information about the body as a whole as captured in the DNA would demonstrate this holographic nature.
If the universe is like a standing wave that comes about from self-interference in a sea of potential, then that would form an integral whole and as such encode (being like a cross-section of, thus reflecting) information about (the total harmonic, being) the whole. Therefore, what seems to be nothing/this underlying timeless pre-existing substrate (of potential) (as part of the 'godhead'-resonance) would not be the absence of everything but rather be something that cancels out to a net-zero in relation to that which is non-zero/manifested and make for something with intricate structure as an 'access-point' to anything that possibly arises from this 'zero'-point/state/condition; where manifested structure arises as resonance of that infinite (wave-)field, that arises from self-interference: like echoing feedback/resonating(/'clipping'). Since reality essentially is a 'resonating', intent could modulate this resonating/resonated harmonic.
The sense of time and geometric/spatial dimensions would consist of - thus emerging, in that sense, from the interrelation of - the many small parts. The iterative nature of the vibrations would also make reality like an (self-interfering) interference pattern - cancelling out a certain way based on one's position/perspective; where coherence/structure(: constructively 'resonanating' 'standing waveforms')/the manifested is that which fails to cancel out locally in a process of the whole being in a self-interfering feedback with itself/interference pattern: forming/consisting of cyclic interactions/iterative or repeating feedback, forming and following deeper structuredness/self-consistency(: coherence) - as, being in a process of balancing (the self-interacting manifested differentiation ultimately branching back into the initial substrate as per entropy - though, locally, order/coherent structure/dynamics may arise), a part balances the whole.
One's awareness would (also) be a feedback-loop. Reality is essentially made up of harmonics, where any fluctuation of the substrate/'godhead'-resonance will loop and self-interfere - causing looping feedback-cycles producing both the manifested coherent structure as well as ultimately condicting awareness - as arises in an alternating between the explicit and implicit.

One's inner/psychic or (perceptual) mind-instrument(s) as flowing/energetic (feedback-)currents conducting life/intelligence
The bodily, psychic, and 'divine' dimensions operate as nested layers of an integrated whole - each being iteration(s) of/as manifestation/expression within of the same overall 'mind-mainframe' one interfaces with mentally within one's mind. One's embodiments exist as part of (the conducting of) abstract informational consciousness/inner feeling-/intelligence-frequencies/energies/vibes, founded and so reflected/resonated in the solid embodiment, the mind and its inner feelings/psyche and spirit being an expression of abstract (or meta-)intelligence-(energetic) dynamics making up its fabric(s)/'medium(s)'/psychic/perspectual construct(s) made up of energies - being one's awareness/realization/experiencing. These structures/(conducting) embodiments would function as a recursive(: being confronted with its own state of being) feedback-system: each level influences/is reflected in, and contains, the/an other - forming a self-sustaining and self-reflective continuum.

Auric/bodily-energetic-/inner harmonic field(s)/(atmo)spheres of influence(: ruling emotional/character-'sound'/harmonic cymatic-like frequencies)
The aura/energetic bodily network/field represents the bodily- and field(s)-energetics (network) as involved in the conducting of one's/an awareness/realizing eye's presence. Inner harmonics arise as informational patterns conducted by energetics: their resonating frequencies/'tones', these harmonics being the feeling(s) that arise from realization/cognition: energetic(s conducting) tones/(energetic) currents(/tension or alleviation) corresponding to the coherence of one's consciousness and conducted energetics; one's inner perception is a mental energy: the realizing and sensing-instruments forming a mental mainframe.
One('s personal inner/psychic aspect) and other(: outer, more significantly apparent) 'grip into' one another - one and other containing one another.
A 'divine' spirit(: psychic force) is like an intelligence(: recursive iterative feedback-loop)-'tone'/harmonic/energetic current/waveform/resonance/signal - conducting a lifeforce that could direct the flow of reality, and supersedes a single embodiment.


Inner harmonics as energies involved in the psyche/intelligence
One's energetic (inner) harmonic resonances/auric sounds/(character/emotional) tones/(atmo)spheres of influence as are one's inner psychic(/realizing) revolutions; such as also one's feeling as coupled to one's thinking/cognition/mental reasoning/drawn conclusions being tonal/harmonic frequencies/resonances/waveforms, so: on a feeling spectrum, like feeling(: metaphorical sound/color) like emotional feeling and/or character vibe/emotional undertone (being the underlying constant long term-accumulatedfeeling conducted through one's presence): involving one's mental aspect and so realizing and understanding-capacity (and its psychic fabric).
Bodily(: 'bio-')electricity would be expressions of the inner harmonic field(s) - being correlated with psychic intelligence(: informational coherence)-states of affairs/being/presence - also involving the (solid) substance(s)/(atmo)sphere(s) of influence.
This bodily electricity would be a tangibly more significantly weighing expression/manifestation/force(s) of the inner harmonic field than the subtle spiritual energies: as part of the being/resonating/being conducting of intelligence/character-energies. It is the intertwining/interaction of more subtle spiritual energetic currents: like those of one's inner mind/psyche - into more significantly weighing and therefore more tangibly apparent-to-us/easily measurable energetic (including: electric, and therefore also magnetic) bodily activity: like the body's neural- and nervous-systems, and cells - for example. These physically tangible expressions/iterations - being flowing/moving energetic currents/circuits - would embody(: reflecting,) the sphere(s) of influence/field(s) of feeling-energy, as come forth from one(: an intelligent, in the sense of aware/realizing, organism): the consciously aware and cognizing psyche-/inner (perceptual)-/mind-, including character- or emotional-, intelligence-sensations/feelings/energetics/vibes/harmonic(s) resonances: like 'tones' of (metaphorical) sound or like (including: 'colors' of) '(ethereal)light' - as part of one's psychic- or intelligence-mainframe/subjective-perspectual instrument(s); for example: the way frequency (including, apparently, that of one's intent - and therefore being of one's consciousness/awareness or connected to one's inner/psychic fabric) would pattern the substance/fabric into forms/structural(ly constructive) (coherency/)patterns - through which the outer expressions, such as the physical body, become part of the living feedback-structure that is one's consciously perceiving/aware/experiencing psychic instrument/apparatus. The energetic harmonics that make up one's inner/psychic feeling/thinking-state(s) of being would ultimately reflect one's soul('s presence) - conducting/of the field of 'intelligence'(: one's inner psychic faculties)-frequencies or frequency/tones/harmonics-resonances/waveforms/(metaphorical) 'sound'(-like energetics)/'(ethereal/auric) light' or energy.

Spirits/spirit-field
You are in a feedback-loop with yourself.
You are an interrelation of spirits.
One/we would be (in) a spirit(ual)(-)(field): an experiencing conducting informational coherence, expressing manifestation; things embody spiritual/psychic (atmo)spheres of influence(/energetic) harmonics.
Spirits resonate spiritual states(: frequencies) - directing the expression of manifestation through (their) informational coherence as well (or like: modulating probabilities/'probability-space' of outcomes/manifestations).


Higher-dimensional & lower-dimensional
Intelligence would be higher-dimensional geometries/structures/informational coherencies with gigantically many more dimensions than those of a lower-dimensional construct like our outer realm. Physical life would be the interacting of that higher-dimensional intelligence having entered/protruded or somehow found its way/integrated into a(: 'our') lower-dimensional projection of this higher-dimensionality. A reflection or, in that sense, projection: as its the lower-dimensional geometric structures of the outer being the solid physical matter/substance, would be the nodes of the unfolding of higher-dimensional hyperstructural (such as a hyperspherical: where torus-fields/structures would, geometrically and dynamically, behave as if it exists in a hyperspherical continuum - as the flow loops back on itself in every plane, giving the appearance of a higher-dimensional 'sphere' in terms of how the field organizes and flows contained energy; or much more complex hyperstructures) substrate.
Lower dimensions cannot capture the full degrees of freedom of higher ones(: like solid substance/matter alone cannot capture the essence of a living and realizing individual - like the total being greater than the sum of its parts), so the outer 3d-realm/reality would necessarily be a projection.
The stability of its fabric(s) would be a stable/coherent standing wave-mechanical mode/structure nested in a higher-dimensional continuum/substrate (being that which would be 'projected'/reflected/manifested into the lower-dimensional).
Like our universe consists of things being ‘thrown'/curved or bent/reflected back onto - or confronted with - itself (such as/including: loops and cycles), and one can only transcend a loop through an extra dimension: like, say, the Earth's surface loops back onto itself and seems flat on a smaller scale while standing on its surface - and one could only fully observe and transcend their curvature by moving in an extra dimension (being upwards/outwards/further away, in this example). Volume (of any kind/type of context and/or fabric) would not so much just be a container, but be the envelope of (repeatedly/recurringly) intersecting higher-dimensional states.
One's inner resolution(s): feelings/inner harmonics, intelligence/thinking and/or imagination - in any case: informational coherence/patterns/structure(s) - would be the (higher-dimensional) 'tuning' of/tuning in to one's reality as the 'sound' one makes creates one's reality.


Higher-dimensionality
The universe has infinities and finite structures mutually nested within one another. The physical universe is infinite because each boundary condition has a before and beyond: is not one-sided, and therefore must entail a continuation in whichever sense, so there is no outer border. An infinite universe therefore also is an infinite set of infinite universes. All infinite, though also with defined/finite expressions - in the outer. Apparently there is intelligence nested in the field, as inferred by the existence of any coherence at all ánd by the existence of any living/life at all.
One's free will would not be excludingly deterministic/coming about from being subject to the circumstances and therefore could not be reduced to a simple abstract set of rules or calculations as what one chooses to do at a given moment - though perhaps constrained and so directed by conditions/circumstances - will always be a consciously chosen action on some level that is not an automation.
Pure randomness (which amounts to: statistical equilibrium with respect to the probability of what may happen next - which also is an artifact of one's thinking/perspective), does not actually really exist because any definite action causes a specific reaction/effect - where there is no ambiguity(: though quantum-particles are approached statistically in terms of 'probabilities', the fact that one may choose this approach in their calculation does not necessarily mean that the particle is probabilistic in nature in itself). (Though, one might call an absence of informational patterning in something - like, say, a sequence of numbers - that one would recognize, or would apply to one, as meaningful/relevant 'randomness'.) Free will would violate this principle of physical determinism in that sense as well: the product being greater than the sum of its parts in that sense as seemingly lifeless particles and energy would ultimately make up a living being capable of free will - therefore indicating it, by nature, supersedes/also is beyond the physical dimensions; also explaining how spiritual states of being could direct the 'flow' or expression of manifestation/'modulate probability-space'.
The reality would (be part) of an informational abstract higher-dimensional context/dimension originating from an inherently alive whole. Oneself's existence would be the 'initial' condition to one's actually(: realizingly) being.
Anything outside of existence, doesn't exist; so there would be something - the existence of which therefore means something would have made its informational coherence possible. This would be an imaginative fabric (that would exist through the meaningfulness: one's intimacy/sincerity/benevolence of one's nature given sublimity given one knows love(: knows what love is). This meaningfulness/experienced added value drives the necessary sublime alignment/coherence(/synergy/integration: being as though one) diffracting/refracting into lower dimensionalities/manifestation/embodiments/(atmo)spheres (of inluence). The reality seems to arise from the alignment/(constructive) coherence passed on from the higher-dimensional substrate (such as in the form of symmetries or evenness or well-balancedness, as is indicated by the symmetric complimentarity of spectra: showing it originated as deviating from that) - meaningfully experienced/realized.
If one should not be able to live with what one has done while being subject to the simulation later on (upon rejoicing in higher realms - or not), it could be one may want to go back to have another attempt at manifesting oneself properly/adequately.
One could ultimately exists because it would not have been meaningful(: of/having added value), ultimately, for there to be merely the absence of existence or nothing (coherent), in that sense - where one's self would be fundamental as one begins and ends with oneself, according to one's perspective - given that everything that actually is present in the sense of being meaningfully experiences/realized. That the outer/content of one's conscious awareness tie back in with one would also be highlighted through our embodiment being so interdependent on - so (product) of(, or attuned with) - the surroundings in which we reside; so the being compatible with, and being thoroughly dependent on, the surroundings: showing how deeply we are interconnected and in that sense one with the reality - showing they must be of similar origin, the reality being a setup in that sense. What else could possibly be a most prominent truth regarding our existence: something alien(ating)? Could there even be something that is not ultimately derived from the essence of one's being, being oneself - given this common origin? Since sublimeness and goodness is apparently so deep rooted in nature(: take the fact evolution of plants and animals does naturally, in principle, does not produce what one could reasonably consider malformed/deformed species, for example - this ruling out that the development of evolutionary progression is exclusively based in/happening through trial and error) it does not seem self-consistent - despite potential local circumstantial fluctuations and deviations - for that goodness not to be a fundamental standard from which might circumstantially be deviated to an extent: given that each individual/one naturally knows intimacy, and so love, to any extent(; as might potentially be inferred by one and/or another from the presence of the quality of one's attention). So its ultimate truth/essence/nature should be of utterly utmost sincerity and/or (ultimately) intimacy.

Why would you even think that anyone or anything divine would want to be called "God"?
The (perceptual) 'screen' (as in: of one's vision) one looks at within one’s mind or inner psyche - or, more broadly: the perceptual fabric bearing the contents of one's realization/experience - would, ultimately, be what this higher-dimensional intelligent- or intimate substrate would be (in a literal, direct sense - not indirectly or causally): the inner can only be inferred in the outer, yet not be specified in terms of it - the way its expressions, or manifestations of - or conducive to - it, can. (The principle behind the so-called 'Gödel’s theorem': very generally/broadly - as a principle in itself - being about something about a system that cannot be proven within the system itself - applies.)
If one is to measure the content of one’s perception only using and so in terms of other contents within one’s perception, it makes sense those contents fail to be able to have quantified what one is in terms of it, therefore requiring the existence of something else. It would be devilish(: a fool's conduct, as one would always fall short in comprehensiveness and completeness and therefore risk isolating - fragmenting - oneself from the greater cosmos and trap or confine oneself in conditional/circumstantial narratives, which may distract one from one's own self/one's own true nature) to try to quantify what one is in terms of what one isn’t(; this is what is meant by that one should not picture ‘God’, as is known to have been said among religious circles).
The fact that the only boundary condition without another side is the edge of one’s vision; if one closes one’s eyes one still sees a dark void with little lights - however: outside of that as well. This is unheard of in the physical reality: any nothingness would always be void or field of some sort. The fact that only the mind bears in it the boundary condition the physical lacks(: in the physical any boundary condition will always have multiple sides) shows that it is the mind that is encompassing the physical. Also given that the outer can be quantified in terms of one’s inner perception’s significance in terms of meaningful experience/realizing. One, however, could only infer the inner psyche from its expressions and never quantify what one is in terms of anything one isn’t successfully and comprehensively.
Intimate & relatively significant
Fire/light symbolizes the visible/apparant and the expressions or expressive/extravert so also the outer, the positive/radiating/emanating, dynamic or forcefully sustained, the making more fleeting of(: burning) substance (and in that sense: dissipating energy): turning solid substance into gasses like smoke, and 'light' energy, so also providing/alleviating as the more congested(: solid substance, or say: long-lasting conflicts), and corresponds to the masculine (character/archetype/)principle. Water symbolizes the background/more introverted/subtle/sensitive and feeling- or intuition-oriented as opposed to just pushing through forcefully: so also inner, hidden/more obscure and less obvious and receptive - and as such is associated with the (well-)balanced (vibratory/wave-like) field (one could consider any literal atmosphere or in the broad sense of being able to include any volume/space/field to be like a 'water': we are like fish who don't know they're living in the water) (water also levels, has waves, has tides based on cycli) and so is associated with the feminine (character/archetype/)principle(; which is also associated with the cyclic because of women's ovulation cycles, and the feminine also is associated with the fine - as opposed to more rugged like the survival-oriented masculine - and well-balanced, so lighter or less dark: women naturally typically have a higher voice than men, a lower sounding voice consisting of more expansively fluctuating - so deviating from their point of balance - soundwaves, as the feminine is more about letting things come together in a nice way). Keep in mind that the wave-like and psychic/inner would be finer/more sensitive and less blunt than the solid forms. The psyche is also the medium/fabric/volume: backdrop, on which everything/all contained content actually exists in terms of being meaningfully experienced/realized/observed. This content is like a diffracted/refracted(: 'lower-dimensional reflection/projection') a negative of oneself(: who knows love/intimacy as opposed to the lifeless blunt mechanically behaving objects of the outer, and so bears more 'light' - so: 'higher-dimensional', also because the intelligence-interrelationary geometries/structures one's mind conducts, such as logic, have vastly many more dimensions than the outer is supposed to have). Within this darker negative, being the outer, things are inverted. This is how in the outer the radiative Sun, lighter or core becomes associated with the masculine - and the actually lighter (and so more central feminine, as everyone initially is intimate and vulnerable - showing we are from a gentle origin) feminine becomes associated - also through cycles - with the darker/reflective Moon; this is because in the world of the relatively significant, the strongest survives - while spiritually(: inwardly/psychically)/morally, the 'sweetest/kindest' really should prevail (keeping in mind that sincerity is not exclusive to any gender). So in the outer, like the sperm-cell is actually alive and is meant to fertilize the woman's egg-cell - which is like the core surrounded by the sperm-cells which are therefore more like the great many smaller sattelites - in the outer, the core: the living, becomes the sattelite; and the outer shell becomes the core. In the inner, inner contains outer - in the outer, outer contains inner; in the spiritual/psychic: inner-oriented, the peaceful is the highest - in the outer the most significant/most powerful rules or is atop the hierarchy. That is why it is the man that has historically long been the head of the family in traditional western - and many other - culture(s), and why the man carries the life-element with him meant to fertilize the woman - the masculine fundamentally being the sattelite as in typically being oriented more around confronting toughness having to do with the outer, and the woman - who also typically has (a) less rugged and softer body(parts) - typically is more about accomodating the intimate aspect of life, and is more about how things feel for one: the inner. Since all living beings are born innocently and vulnerably: intimately/sincerely, and requiring gentleness - this seems to be the initial/fundamental condition of our actual(ly existing: meaningfully realized, therefore being subject to one's perspectual preposition) being: intimacy is one's standard condition/configuration(: the 'core'), which can only be deviated(: the 'sattelite') from to an extend later on.

An open 'third eye'/being psychically (and intuitively) activated
Contact with animals/the natural world 'opens'/activates one's (so-called) 'third eye' (or causes 'psychic activation'): strengthening one's intuition and activating one's psychic subtle hallucinatory perception(s)/sense(s).
An open/activated third eye might help alleviate the sometimes potentially confining or unpleasant (thereby possibly intensifying one's sense of pressing urgency) sensations associated with one's physical/bodily needs (such as could be: eating and drinking), so that - those then having been alleviated - one could, once again, 'hear' or 'be with' oneself (or one's own presence and intuition) more clearly and more immediately; and such that it contributes to retaining one's own free will: a clear horizon; or not necessarily or against one's better judgement having to be subject, succumbing or responding to one's sense of desire, yearning, excitation, romance or fear - or the 'heavier'/more turbulent and 'lower'(-dimensional) portions of the emotional spectrum in general. So, through 'enlightening' one's feeling and/or bodily sensations. It may cause one to become more (hyper-)sensitive and/or (hyper-)intelligent. Animals may pick up on this, and could begin to respond to one differently - like showing/revealing themselves more or being startled less quickly(; perhaps even in an attempt to, somehow, contribute to clearing/cleaning one energetically or aurically/psychically - or otherwise keeping one healthy, and one's perceiving on point/in tune. Animals may - all of a sudden, at times - (at least seem to) directly (like: immediately or the same second) respond to and/or (at least seem to) interact with one's thinking/feeling/inner (state of being) - through, for instance, revealing/showing themselves and/or moving closely past one, or making (certain beautiful/sincere, or more disrupting, sounds). Through, say: hearing their sounds, or feeling/tuning in to their vibe, one might heal oneself energetically/aurically/psychically - through resonating (with) their increased sense of innocence(: as they are more vulnerable), intimacy and sincerity.
On LSD, for example, one could - as one's perception begins to alter, such as things beginning to move and look 'wavy' or an intensified perception (perhaps also aided by hallucinations) of, say, beauty (especially as one is already looking at something one finds beautiful - in this case - at that moment: one's perception and hallucinating therefore responding to one's psychic state/tuning) - also begin to pick up on other's thinking/psychic states - even others one doesn't see at that moment (such as in the street while one is inside, nearby - or hidden behind another surface) in/through one's own thinking/feeling and visually(: in what one hallucinates around one), for example. One would 'see' (the effects of) one's inner/psyche(: psychic volume/field) more as one is influenced by psychic/inner energies(: psychic field) from within(: one's own) and around one(: from others) more.
• Living beings would be subconsciously connected or interrelating energetically, being able to sense one another's state of being/feeling and thinking/intention without even necessarily consciously noticing this (at all) - through the intuition; take the following instance: my living space faces the backyard. Across the backyard is a relatively compact sports hall which belongs to the school behind the house where I live, and this sports hall has windows. Every now and then, they leave the bright lights on by accident even after the school closes for the day - resulting in the backyard being showered in light by night, which is a minor inconvenience for me when I'm wanting to sleep. So, not really expecting anything from it, as the time about approached the hour the school usually tends to close (I don't have or know their exact schedule), I said to myself that I really quite hoped they would still turn off the lights and had not left already, having forgotten to do so. About 30 seconds to one minute later, the lights were turned off by someone (which I assume they do when they're done working - and assuming they don't have an automated light switch or anything, telling from the fact that sometimes they forget to turn it off) at around 18:15 (usually the close a bit before 18:00, so I had actually expected them to already have forgotten when I said I hoped they hadn't). A couple weeks later, again - approaching 18:00 - the lights were still on, and as I do more often I exclaimed my hope they would not forget to turn them off if someone was still there. About 20 seconds (and no more than 30 seconds) later, I saw the light getting turned off. An important detail: I cannot possibly hear or see who is in the sports hall and what they're up to, as the windows are quite high up - so I can only see the upper portion of the back wall, and the ceiling - and if the lights are on or not... Also: of course one might naturally approximate when the lights could approximately be turned off through a feeling of timing or one's biological clock; but to - in a timespan of not more than a few weeks - have my attention be drawn to the fact I hope they won't forget to turn it off that closely (both times explicitly verbally exclaiming out loud within my own home at an ordinary level of loudness/using my regular inside voice, less than one minute, the second time about 20-30 seconds) prior to them being turned off, twice, would have to - without such subconscious sensing and cueing - be an unrealistically unlikely coincidence, which is therefore not plausibly probable (from a logical standpoint).




